Training, Knowledge, Ethics, Recruitment, Lawsuits, Government Testimony, Academic papers, FSP Paper,
Mr. Montgomery asked how companies would control brokers who were selling insurance.
1994-3, NAIC Proceedings
- Commissioner Wilcox responded that, in many companies, the actuary did not have the ability to control illustrations; this regulation would bring credibility and integrity to the process.
- Problems that occur now are sometimes because the company did not see what the agent had prepared.
1994-3, NAIC Proceedings, p565 (607)
Mr. Coleman <Prudential> agreed that by law a company is responsible for its agents.
If an agent fails to act as its company requires, the company must deal with the agent.
Mr. Nepple agreed that the law is clear that a company is responsible for its agents, but he saw some value in having the redundancy.
1994-4, NAIC Proceedings
Illustration Usage / Policy Summary/ Policy Overviews
George Coleman (Prudential) said it had been his understanding that illustrations would not be required at the point of sale.
- He said some agents did not use illustrations and he thought it more appropriate to get a signature on an illustration at the end of the process so that the one illustration signed matched the policy applied for.
1995-1, NAIC Proceedings
- In the state of Maryland, a recently enacted disclosure regulation has two special features.
- First, there must appear a statement in the disclosure form which warns that any oral statement of the agent should be considered in the purchase decision, but only if it is reduced to writing and given to the applicant.
1979 - Cost Disclosure - Society of Actuaries
First of all, I believe there is cause for concern arising from the repeated inferences, both in this paper and elsewhere, that the agent is somehow obligated to provide "service" long after the sale on the policies that he has sold.
Certainly the insurer has an obligation to provide such service, but I cannot agree with the rationale that it must be done through the agent.
No other industry expects its salesmen to double as servicemen and technicians.
The normal agent's contract authorizes him to do three things:
- submit applications,
- deliver policies, and
- collect the initial premium thereon.
In no way is he authorized to do such things as secure policy loans for the insured, let alone to answer questions about policy provisions and dividends, which he probably is not qualified to do.
1974 - CONSUMERISM AND THE COMPENSATION OF THE LIFE INSURANCE AGENT, by Anna Rappaport, Society of Actuaries
Life Insurance Buyer's Guide
NAIFA - Video, State Farm, Van Mueller, Training
Wicka - How do Agents use these? It would be good to hear from agents.
2010 - Blumenthal v New York Life
2018 - Vogt v State Farm
- Slott/ Veralytic - Video
- Agents aren't actuaries
- 1979 -vWho is going to tell them...$, Plan of Insurance
- 2002 - Nobody understands UL
- Walker v LSW - Stemler
- GOV - Agent - Sales Seminars vs Training
- 199x - Agent
Government Testimony -
-197x - Father
- 2010 - Maloof vs John Hancock
- Supreme Court of Alabama,September 30, 2010, Google Scholar
- 1999 - Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Haney
- 1998 - CASTEELv.CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, August 28, 1997 / Publication Ordered July 6, 19
-CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CASTEEL, Argued November 19, 1998.
- 1995 - Sales Illustrations, Society of Actuaries
- My next comment relates to the vanishing premium "payback." I guess I'd have to say I'm disappointed that companies haven't defended themselves more vigorously in this whole situation. Maybe the reason is that their agents didn't do the proper job at the point of sale. But if the agent did, and if the agents have a good file, and they've been following up since the point of sale/issue and have communicated properly to their clients the impact of interest rate changes on at least an annual basis, I don't think we would have this problem. I found it fascinating that the agent in the Crown Life case got $40 million for mental anguish. -- Kevin A. Marti