Vogt v State Farm
- 2017 - LC - Deposition of Mrs Vogt v State Farm - 20p
- Illustrations - Speak for Themselves. Root: I wish they did.
- Vogt v State Farm - Illustrations - 13p
- Vogt v State Farm - Annual Notices - 33p
- Mrs. Vogt’s testimony reveals that the Vogts’ actual grievance with the policy performance arose from their agent’s alleged oral representation in 1999 that if they paid a $150 premium each month, their $100,000 policy would remain in force and would never lapse. (Ex. A at 17:17-20:12.)
- 2017 - Vogt v. STATE FARMLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY - Dist. Court, WD Missouri, 2017 - Google Scholar
- 2018 - Vogt v. STATE FARMLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY - Dist. Court, WD Missouri, 2018 - Google Scholar
- 2020 - Vogt v. STATE FARMLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, 2020 - Google Scholar
- 2000 1005 - Annual Report - Continued planned payments of $150.00 each month will provide coverage until:
- November 5, 2005, based on guaranteed rates
- July 5, 2013, based on current rates
- 2004 1005 - Annual Report - Continued planned payments of $150.00 each month will provide coverage until:
- June 5, 2009, based on guaranteed rates
- October 5, 2014, based on current rates
- 2012 1008 - Annual Report - If continued planned payments of $150 .00 each month will provide coverage until:
- October 5, 2013, when the Insured's age Is 67, based on guaranteed rates
- July 5, 2014, when the lnsured's age Is 68, based on current rates
2017 - LC - Vogt v State Farm - Mrs. Vogt Deposition
Mrs Vogt Deposition - 2017/12/13
https://www.lexislegalnews.com/articles/61740/u-s-high-court-refuses-to-review-life-insurer-s-petition-challenging-class-certification - April 19, 2021
State Farm’s petition for writ of certiorari
Vogt’s response in opposition
State Farm’s reply
Brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States - Document #50-210408-004B of America as amicus in support of State Farm
Motion of American Council of Life Insurers for leave to file amicus brief in support of State Farm