Optional Federal Charter
- H.R. 3200, introduced last July by Representatives Melissa Bean and Ed Royce, is a strong consumer protection bill, which focuses on a centralized system that emphasizes safety, soundness, and consistency of regulation.
- And as Representative Bean highlighted, these protections come without sacrificing State premium taxes.
- We also strongly support the Treasury’s view that an optional Federal charter would play an important role in the new world of integrated financial markets, and would address the burdens imposed by the State system on insurers and consumers alike.
- Insurers, banks, and capital markets investors are now offering products that may be substitutes for each other...
-- ALASTAIR SHORE (CUNA) ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS...
2008 0416 - GOV - EXAMINING PROPOSALS ON INSURANCE REGULATORY REFORM
- [PDF-188p, No Video]
- That is why we strongly support the comprehensive approach to improving insurance regulation reflected in the legislation that Senators Sununu and Johnson have proposed.
- Having an optional Federal charter operating alongside a gradually improving State system of regulation seems to us to be the right way to go.
- And it parallels the successful dual chartering mechanism we see in the commercial banking sector.
-- John D. Johns - on behalf of the American Council of Life Insurers <ACLI>
- If we want to address the problems in the insurance industry, I strongly urge that a federally chartered insurance corporation be set up, along the same lines of the FDIC, to monitor this industry.
- Indeed, if you think that the property/casualty crisis is difficult, I can assure you that the same crisis will come home, in spades, with the life insurance industry in approximately three to five years and it is not too late to address that crisis.
-- Michael A. Hatch, commissioner, Department of Commerce, State of Minnesota,
1986 0225 - Letter to Senator Dale Bumpers
1986 - GOV - The Cost and Availability of Liability Insurance, Part 2
- While I applaud the life insurance industry for attempting to make their case of the need for a dual system of insurance regulation in their bid to compete with federally regulated security products, I still have many concerns regarding various proposals for an optional Federal insurance charter.
- In particular, proposals which include the property and casualty line of insurance as a part of the Federal charter.
- As you may know, Alabama has a $1.3 billion per year insurance business, resulting in $240 million of insurance premium taxes every year.
- A proposed optional Federal insurance charter not only could reduce this important source of State revenue in an era of tight State budgets and dwindling State income taxes but will also threaten the ability for States to adequately fund their State insurance departments. (p6)
-- SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama
2003/11/05 - GOV - REFORMING INSURANCE REGULATION: MAKING THE MARKETPLACE MORE COMPETITIVE FOR CONSUMERS - 200p