Richard Shelby
Richard Shelby
- Richard Shelby (R-AL)
- 1986-1994 – US Senator (Democrat)
- 1994-2023 – US Senator (Republican)
- 2015 1014 – Shelby Delivers Speech on “The Trouble with Dodd-Frank” at Harvard Law School – [link]
- AIG – 2008 Financial Crisis
- Dodd-Frank
- Military – Life Insurance
- p21 – Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL) – I personally believe that companies that are doing business this way, as you describe, exploiting our soldiers, should be banned or something. You know, I do not know exactly how we are going to do it, but we are going to look seriously, Senator Sarbanes and I working with Senator Enzi and others, Senator Allard, on legislation.
2005 1117 – GOV (Senate) – A Review Of The GAO Report On The Sale Of Financial Products To Military Personnel, Richard Shelby (R-AL) — [BonkNote]
- 2010 0813 – Letter – Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) to Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) – 1p
- Recent press reports have raised concerns….
- Because the regulation of insurance falls under the Banking Committee’s jurisdiction, it is the Committee’s obligation to ensure that insurance regulation adequately protects our service members and their families.
- Accordingly, I believe that the Banking Committee should hold a hearing to examine these reports and determine if any unfair practices exist.
- I have already instructed my staff to begin investigating this issue in preparation for a hearing.
- (p27) – Senator Richard SHELBY. What does ”relatively” mean?
- Mr. MCRAITH. Well, that means–
- Senator SHELBY. You say they are in ”relatively” good shape.
- Mr. MCRAITH. First of all, I would never say publicly whether any one company were in trouble, but at the same time, I am not going to mislead you, Senator.
- The companies that we are regulating, we are comfortable with their financial status.
2009 0317 – GOV (Senate) – Perspectives on Modernizing Insurance Regulation, Chris Dodd (D-CT) — [BonkNote]
- (p29) – Senator Richard SHELBY (R-AL).- Mr. Hunter, do you agree with his statement ?
- [Bonk: his = Michael McRaith (NAIC / Illinois Insurance Commissioner]
- What is your take on it.
- J. Robert HUNTER (CFA). – I didn’t hear him answer the question.
- Chairman DODD. He did–
- Mr. HUNTER. I don’t think it could handle-I don’t think the guaranty funds could handle it, no.
- Senator SHELBY. Couldn’t handle it–
- Mr. HUNTER. That was your question, and I don’t think they–
- Senator SHELBY. It would be too big for them to handle, would it not?
- Mr. HUNTER. Of course. Yes.
- Senator SHELBY. I thought so, too. Thank you.
2009 0317 – GOV (Senate) – Perspectives on Modernizing Insurance Regulation, Chris Dodd (D-CT) — [BonkNote]
- 2015 0325 – GOV (Senate) – FSOC Accountability Nonbank Designations, Richard Shelby (R-AL)
- [PDF-165p, VIDEO-CSPAN – <Bad Link>
- (p34) – Chairman SHELBY. Mr. Hughes, insurance products-you know this well-especially long-term insurance contracts such as life insurance, face a much different probability for runs and, thus, failure than one would typically fear with banks.
- We have heard concerns that FSOC’s designation process treats these insurance contracts similar to bank assets, but they are different.
- Would you discuss the likelihood of a so-called run on insurance products such as life insurance and what such a run would have to look like in order to cause systemic risk?
- As a liability-driven business, insurance often has long-term cash-flow patterns compared to shorter-term activities at banks.
- Consequently, current law fails, I believe, to adequately account for the business model and risk profile of insurance companies, and that should concern us all. (p1)
— Richard Shelby (R-AL)
The State of the Insurance Industry and Insurance Regulation, Richard Shelby (R-AL) — [BonkNote]
- 1987 0128 – GOV (Senate) – Corporate Takeovers
- [PDF-?, VIDEO-CSPAN]
- 13:50-15:00 – Richard Shelby: Ramifications of Hostile Takeovers, Monopoly References, Go To Jail Card, Are Hostile Takeovers Criminal or simply Capitalistic in nature?
- 15:00- – Metzenbaum –
- Senate – Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
- AIG’s problems, however, were not isolated to its credit default swap business.
- Significant losses in AIG’s State-regulated life insurance companies also contributed to the company’s collapse.
- Approximately a dozen of AIG’s life insurance subsidiaries operated a securities lending program whereby they loaned out securities for short periods in exchange for cash collateral.
- Typically, an insurance company or bank will lend securities and reinvest the cash collateral in very safe short-term instruments.
- AIG’s insurance companies, however, invested their collateral in riskier long-term mortgage-backed securities.
- And although they were highly rated at the time, approximately half of them were backed by subprime and Alternate-A mortgage loans.
- Because AIG was unable to cover its obligations to both its securities lending and derivatives operations, it ultimately had to seek Federal assistance.
- In total, AIG’s life insurance companies suffered approximately $21 billion in losses related to securities lending in 2008.
- (p4) – Significant losses in AIG’s State-regulated life insurance companies also contributed to the company’s collapse.
- (p5) – More than $17 billion in Federal assistance has been used to recapitalize the State-regulated insurance companies to ensure that they are able to pay their policy holders’ claims.
— Statement of Senator Richard C. Shelby (R-AL)
2009 0305 – GOV (Senate) – American International Group: Examining What Went Wrong, Government Intervention, And Implications for Future Regulation, (CSPAN) Government Intervention and Regulation of AIG, Chris Dodd (D-CT) — [BonkNote]